USDA.gov
National Agricultural 

Library Masthead
Random images that represent what the National Agricultural 

Library offers
  HomeAbout NALNational Agricultural Library CatalogNational Agricultural Library CollectionsInformation CentersNational Agricultural Library ServicesHelpContact Us
 Search National Agricultural Library
   
Search all USDA
advanced search
search tips
browse by audience
browse by subject
animals and livestock
education and outreach
food and nutrition
history, art and biography
laws and regulations
marketing and trade
natural resources and environment
plants and crops
research and technology
rural and community 

development
 
You are here: Home / News and Events / InfoFarm: The NAL Blog(What is this?)
News and Events
  
InfoFarm

And the Oscar Goes to . . .

A film director holds a movie clapboardToday, two people are $2,500 richer and at least 29,000 others are better informed about water quality issues thanks to the Environmental Protection Agency's recent water quality video contest.

The contest closed on Earth Day, April 22nd, but with participation beyond anyone's expectations, it took a while to pick the winners from the 254 entries.

The winning short (30 to 60 seconds) focuses on one simple thing we can all do to protect our local watersheds, check our cars for oil leaks.

The victor in the long format (1 to 3 minutes) illustrates how polluted runoff threatens ecosystems and offers tips people can take to protect water quality. The filmmaker inventively used discarded paper in the creation of the film's unique animation style.

Now, as much as I like these two videos, along with many of the other submissions, I couldn't find any that gave more than a passing reference to agriculture's impact on water quality (though I readily admit I did not watch them all).

Not one to leave you unfulfilled on that front, I put my power searching skills to work and found just the thing, an impressive, entertaining and educational product from our governmental counterparts to the North, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.

Their animated feature stars Robocow, a hero to humans and animals alike, who uncovers problems like improperly stored farm chemicals and poor manure management and corrects them. She is the true champion in my book, a bovine superhero who sets about making our waters clean and our world a better place. (And she flies, which is just pretty darn cool.)

But should Robocow be busy elsewhere, you'll find more environmental heros at NAL's Water Quality Information Center. They don't fly like Robocow, but they do talk, which gives them a definite leg up when it comes to answering your questions.

Posted by Mary Ann Leonard

Added to Water Quality on July 01, 2009 EST | Permalink

Share your comments

Lively discussions and different opinions are encouraged within the bounds of respectful civil discourse. Questionable language, personal attacks, off-topic comments, and gratuitous links will either be edited or deleted. Comments are moderated and will not appear on InfoFarm until they have been approved.




This blog does not represent official communications from the National Agricultural Library, the Agricultural Research Service or the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
<< What do you geek? | Main
Back to Top

What do you geek?

A young boy announces, 'I geek worms.'

Copyright: geekthelibrary.org and OCLC

"Geek," apparently, is now a verb. At least OCLC, a nonprofit library cooperative, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation are seeking to make it so in a fresh, glossy public awareness campaign launched last week.

The nerds-are-cool edge to the "Geek the Library" campaign is tapping into the idea that everyone is passionate about something — everyone "geeks" something — and that the library supports them all.

Though the campaign is focused on the value of public libraries in their communities, the message that libraries offer a place to explore ideas, ignite interests and feed passions applies equally well to the governmental realm.

NAL is proof of that.

As if to validate that, the initial pilot campaign, which is debuting in only Iowa and Georgia, uses four ag-related topics among the dozen ads meant to pique curiosity and prod others into revealing how they get their geek on. Besides the boy into worms, pictured above, individual ads also include a young woman who geeks composting, an older woman who geeks beekeeping, and a serious, bald fellow who seriously geeks barbecue.

And, so far, among the contributions from the masses, Melissa has proudly admitted to geeking farmers markets.

Fortunately, for Melissa and all the geeking public, NAL and USDA can get you what you need on all these topics and more. From barbecue and beekeeping to composting, worms and farmers markets, we've got it.

So, what do you geek? Let us know below or join the growing numbers chiming in at geekthelibrary.org.

Or get your geek on right now with a look at just some of what NAL has in its massive catalog. The best geeking starts here.

Posted by Mary Ann Leonard

Added to Libraries on June 30, 2009 EST | Permalink

Share your comments

Lively discussions and different opinions are encouraged within the bounds of respectful civil discourse. Questionable language, personal attacks, off-topic comments, and gratuitous links will either be edited or deleted. Comments are moderated and will not appear on InfoFarm until they have been approved.




This blog does not represent official communications from the National Agricultural Library, the Agricultural Research Service or the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
<< Now We're Squawkin', Part 2 | Main | And the Oscar Goes to . . . >>
Back to Top

Now We're Squawkin', Part 2

A cartoon chicken sings into a microphoneResearchers at the University of Connecticut want to know what chickens have to say. Literally.

Ph.D. candidate Ebenezer Otu-Nyarko, along with Animal Science Professor Michael Darre, is studying the squawks and clucks of Gallus gallus domesticus, i.e., chickens, to determine what meaning might be gleaned from their different sounds.

Apparently, there's more to be heard than just some bird-brained ramblings. [Video]

Instead, the chicken's 24 unique vocalizations do seem to have some significance. If they're too hot, researchers hear one sound. Too crowded, another.

That is, their sounds correlate to the conditions they're under, which might not tell us what they're really saying, but it could alert us to what might be going on for them that we humans are missing.

And catching what we've been missing will help people better care for the chickens. That, in turn, should improve the chickens' egg production and growth rate. (Stressed chickens lay fewer eggs, as anyone who has seen Chicken Run can tell you, and they also need more feed to gain weight.)

Furthermore, if the hen house chatter can actually reveal when the chickens are under stress, it might also inform the ongoing debate regarding how chickens are housed.

Said Darre, "We can get their vocalizations when no humans are around, and we can determine whether they are actually under a poor welfare condition or not."

Still, given the vehemence with which that issue is being debated, I wonder if chicken linguistics will really help settle things.

The UConn research is an off-shoot of the Dr. Doolittle Project, which is attempting to establish a system for analyzing and classifying animal vocalizations across species, including tigers, elephants and beluga whales. (Apparently, without Rex Harrison around, we now have to rely upon computers and bioacoustics to understand what animals' squeaks, grunts and warbles are about.)

For more on chickens, see Now We're Squawkin' (Part 1). You won't find an English-Chicken dictionary there -- because, well, one doesn't exist (yet) -- but you will be taken to all the best poultry resources NAL has to offer. And that, my friends, is nothing to squawk about.

Posted by Mary Ann Leonard

Added to Animals on June 23, 2009 EST | Permalink

Share your comments

Lively discussions and different opinions are encouraged within the bounds of respectful civil discourse. Questionable language, personal attacks, off-topic comments, and gratuitous links will either be edited or deleted. Comments are moderated and will not appear on InfoFarm until they have been approved.

Neat notes. Chickens are telling us why, I guess, :).

I also recently heard serious talk about other birds' songs and such, with some splendid examples notes and described in an NPR program recently.

This program was: Understanding Birdsong -- and Its Fans
by Terry Gross (linked here:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4565590)

Some of the interesting detail includes discussions of the fact that there are many varied details we barely hear. Some examples of the songs are available from this page, played at slower speeds to deconstruct and hear the details. Listening link (WM plater) is here:
http://www.npr.org/templates/dmg/dmg.php?prgCode=FA&showDate=29-Mar-2005&segNum=2&NPRMediaPref=WM

Thanks, again!
- Karl

Submitted by: Karl S on June 24, 2009 09:21 AM

Rockin' Robins why not! Of course their vocalizations have some meaning. Any farmer can tell you that. Otherwise why bother. Probably saying, "Yummy get worms" "my corn" "I'm safe" I'm not safe"

Submitted by: maggie b on June 24, 2009 02:01 PM

I don't mean to be disrespectful, and I'm sure the researchers and the people who designed this study and/or those who decided that this study neede to be done, all mean well, but, why are you doing this? Or more to the point, why is NAL spending tax payer money on this? You could have gone out and talked to poultry growers, especially commercial broiler growers who work with hundreds of thousands of chickens each year, to find out what chicken vocalizations mean.

While I appreciate what you (NAL) are doing, I question your methodology and the money spent when you could have achieved the same goal while saving the taxpayers a fair ammount of money in these tough economic times.

Submitted by: Joanne Rigutto on June 25, 2009 01:10 AM

Hi, Joanne.

As noted, the research is actually being done at the University of Connecticut. NAL has nothing to do with it, other than the fact that I just wrote a blog post about it.

As for talking to poultry growers, I do wonder myself if the researchers have done that, or if they're relying solely upon the data they're gathering through their recordings. None of the small handful of articles I read on the topic mentioned that they were, but that is not conclusive, of course.

Submitted by: Mary Ann on June 25, 2009 04:53 PM




This blog does not represent official communications from the National Agricultural Library, the Agricultural Research Service or the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
<< Every Day, Every Way | Main | What do you geek? >>
Back to Top

Every Day, Every Way

A map of Kentucky with dots showing the stops on Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack's recent tour of the state

U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack likes to call USDA the "every day, every way" department. As Vilsack explains, "There's virtually no part of a community that's not impacted by USDA's investments."

The reach of USDA becomes clear in this video from C-SPAN in which the Secretary visits Kentucky to listen to residents' concerns and to assess how the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is making a difference in these communities.

The hour-long video follows Vilsack as he holds a town meeting and tours a hospital in Harrodsburg, meets with a family in their home in Shelbyville and visits a food bank in Louisville.

The Kentucky trip comes as part of the Secretary's multi-state "listening tour" in rural America. In addition to Kentucky, he has already visited Colorado, Missouri, Georgia, Illinois and Indiana.

Coincidentally, NAL has also reached into these states, as well as most, if not all, of the 54 others, through the work of the Rural Information Center. Talking with RIC is certainly not the same as having the Secretary in your living room, but I think you'll find the exchange just as rewarding, particularly if you're looking for rural resources or funding sources.

Maybe C-SPAN will do a video about them next.

Posted by Mary Ann Leonard

Added to Rural Life on June 09, 2009 EST | Permalink

Share your comments

Lively discussions and different opinions are encouraged within the bounds of respectful civil discourse. Questionable language, personal attacks, off-topic comments, and gratuitous links will either be edited or deleted. Comments are moderated and will not appear on InfoFarm until they have been approved.




This blog does not represent official communications from the National Agricultural Library, the Agricultural Research Service or the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
<< USDA Commits to Organic | Main | Now We're Squawkin', Part 2 >>
Back to Top

USDA Commits to Organic

USDA's Organic SealOrganic will be finding a place in the work of more agencies across USDA, according to Kathleen Merrigan, the Department's Deputy Secretary of Agriculture.

Speaking at the third annual Organic Summit last week, Merrigan made clear that "organic can no longer be stove-piped at USDA." She further emphasized, "Organic should be integrated across all the agencies . . . Each and every agency at USDA should have some engagement with the organic sector." [Watch video of Merrigan's address]

Merrigan's comments come a month after she announced that $50 million has been committed toward the Department's 2009 Organic Initiative, a nationwide program to provide financial assistance to National Organic Program organic producers or producers in transition to organic farming.

Her comments also dovetail with USDA's first-ever, wide-scale survey of organic farming in the United States. Going on through June 17, the Organic Production Survey, a supplement to the 2007 Census of Agriculture, will examine how the growth of organic farming is changing the face of U.S. agriculture. Survey results will help shape decisions regarding farm policy, funding allocations, availability of goods and services, and many other key issues.

As many of those involved in organics already know, NAL has been helping those engaged in organic production for many years now. The Alternative Farming Systems Information Center continues to locate, organize and distribute authoritative and comprehensive information on the topic through its publications and Web site. The site's special section on Organic Production covers a range of related topics, from the nutritive content of organic foods to seed sources, production methods, marketing and food safety issues. It's a great starting point for consumers, farmers and wannabe farmers alike. Tell 'em Deputy Secretary Merrigan sent you.

Posted by Mary Ann Leonard

Added to Organic Production on June 08, 2009 EST | Permalink

Share your comments

Lively discussions and different opinions are encouraged within the bounds of respectful civil discourse. Questionable language, personal attacks, off-topic comments, and gratuitous links will either be edited or deleted. Comments are moderated and will not appear on InfoFarm until they have been approved.




This blog does not represent official communications from the National Agricultural Library, the Agricultural Research Service or the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
<< Bumper Sticker Wisdom | Main | Every Day, Every Way >>
Back to Top
 
InfoFarm
    Agritourism
    Animals
    Art, Artifacts and Photos
    Biography
    Blogging
    Copyright
    Education
    Emergency Response
    Farm Bill
    Farm Safety
    Food and Nutrition
    History of Agriculture
    Invasive Species
    Libraries
    Marketing and Trade
    Natural Resources & Environment
    Organic Production
    Plants and Crops
    Poetry
    Rural Life
    Technology Transfer
    Water Quality
See Also
    Gov Gab
    Library of Congress Blog
    U.S. Government Blogs
Media Help
 To view PDF files you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader installed on your computer.

To view Flash files you must  have Macromedia Flash Player  installed on your computer.
 

NAL Home | USDA | Agricultural Research Service | Science.gov | GPO Access | Web Policies and Important Links | Site Map
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House